Montoya: Mercedes Should Have Double-Stacked Russell and Antonelli at Monza
Dựa trên thông tin từ F1 TV và Autosport, Juan Pablo Montoya cho rằng Mercedes đã khiến George Russell mất lợi thế tại Monza vì không ưu tiên pit cho Russell trong thời điểm virtual safety car và không chọn phương án double-stack hai tay đua. Mercedes giành 1-2 với Andrea Kimi Antonelli, nhưng chiến thuật này vẫn gây tranh cãi. • Key facts: • Russell dẫn đầu giai đoạn đầu trước khi VSC xuất hiện giữa chặng. • Antonelli được gọi vào pit, trở thành tay đua Italy đầu tiên thắng tại Monza kể từ năm 1966. • Montoya: Đáng lẽ Russell phải được pit trước và có thể double-stack. • Wolff: Russell không còn lựa chọn vì dùng lốp hard và theo chiến lược một pit. • Source attribution: F1 TV/Autosport, xuất bản ngày 7 tháng 9 năm 2025 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn • Related Q&A: • Hỏi: Russell có thể thắng nếu Mercedes double-stack không? Đáp: Không chắc, vì Antonelli vẫn có thể bắt kịp và vượt lên bằng tốc độ và lốp mới. • Hỏi: Vì sao Mercedes không cho Russell pit? Đáp: Mercedes cho rằng chiến lược một pit là đúng, và không có lựa chọn nào khác cho Russell khi anh dùng lốp hard.
Juan Pablo Montoya believes Mercedes compromised George Russell’s Italian Grand Prix by not double-stacking its drivers under the virtual safety car. The former Formula 1 driver made the point on F1 TV’s post-race show after Mercedes took a 1-2 finish at Monza.
Andrea Kimi Antonelli recovered from 19th on the grid to claim his maiden victory in Italy, becoming the first Italian winner at Monza since 2026. George Russell controlled the early phase of the race and was leading when the VSC was deployed. Mercedes called Antonelli in for fresh tyres but left Russell on track. Antonelli rejoined, carved through the pack and eventually passed Russell for the win.
Montoya argued that Mercedes should have given priority to Russell, the race leader: “He was leading and he should have had the priority on the pitstop. When that virtual safety car came, at that point, it’s quicker to stop than staying out. They should have stopped him, they should have double-stacked him, and he should have stopped ahead of Antonelli.”
He also said he was not claiming Antonelli would not have won, but the battle between the team-mates would have been much closer. “And I’m not saying Antonelli wouldn’t still catch him and win the race, but it would have been a really close fight like we saw earlier on. It would have been a really cool race at the end for all of us.”
Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff defended the strategy. Wolff told Sky Sports F1: “The two-stop was the best but we didn’t think it was the case, so that was good for him actually. But today there was nothing that would have stopped him [Antonelli]. George fought with worn-out tools at the end, so I’m really happy for the one-two.”
When asked if Russell had any alternative strategy, Wolff said: “No, George was on the hard and we needed to go on the one-stop so there was no chance.”
The controversy highlights how a VSC pit stop can define a race. If Mercedes had double-stacked its drivers, Russell would have kept track position and forced Antonelli to overtake him on track. Instead, Russell was left with old hard tyres, while Antonelli had the advantage of a fresh set and track position gained by an earlier stop.
Mercedes celebrated a memorable 1-2 and a home victory for Antonelli, but the strategic decision that led to that outcome is likely to remain a talking point.
Cầu thủ liên quan
Bài đề xuất
When 'Italian Grand Prix Betting Guide' is an Empty Shell: A Lesson in Content Verification2026-09-03
Verstappen’s GT3 Switch: From 24th to Ninth and What Remains Unverified2026-10-18
Flavio Briatore Takes Aim at McLaren and 'Nasty' Judge After Pierre Gasly Ruling2026-09-05
Vowles admits fear of losing both Sainz and Albon: The Williams web tightens2026-09-03
Hadjar injury, Lawson promotion, Tsunoda's return: Red Bull showcases its driver pipeline2026-09-03
Ferrari and the tyre window: why Leclerc stopped at fourth in United States GP qualifying2026-10-26
Bài đề xuất
Vettel Isn't Sending His CV, But the F1 Market Is Still Pricing Him2026-09-29
Leclerc, Hamilton and Ferrari's 2026 Driver-Feel Problem2026-09-22
F1 Driver Market 2026: When Analytical Reports Are Empty, Money Speaks the Only Truth2026-09-03
The Buried Truth Behind Mercedes' Victory: When Red Bull Lost Its Brain and Ferrari Faces a Great Gamble2026-09-30
The Financial Layer of F1: Cost Cap, Wind Tunnel and the Backmarker Trap2026-10-18
Monza: Russell Tops FP2 But Ferrari Remains the 'Key Card'?2026-09-05
Bài đề xuất
Monza: Russell Tops FP2 But Ferrari Remains the 'Key Card'?2026-09-05
McLaren, the billion-dollar milestone, and the £166m gap between headline and ledger2026-09-30
Hamilton Joins Ferrari: The Biggest Transfer and a Question Without an Answer2026-10-15
The Secret Behind F1 Numbers: When Tactical Analysis Meets the Information Wall2026-09-06
The Lesson of an Empty Report: When F1 Has No Data, a Writer Must Know When to Stay Silent2026-09-07
Antonelli's Seventh Pole of 2026 at COTA: Mercedes Won Qualifying but Races One Against Two2026-10-25
